Below are team presentations in PDF format from mini-case studies conducted at the Woodshole Research Center during the Falmouth, MA Training Session.

	Team A Kathy Bevers, UOregon Walter Grondzik, FAMU Bob Crowell, UVirginia Gregg Daly, Onset Computer Nibedita Das, Kansas State Jeff Dennis, Onset Computer Moses Ling, Penn State
Hypothesis: Indoor air quality is lower at the upper level than at the basement level during occupied hours when the building is naturally ventilated. Indoor Air Quality - as determined using CO2 levels as a surrogate indicator of contaminants, with acceptable limit of 1000 ppm max Natural Ventilation - ventilation by means of openings in the building envelope Document: (1.0 mb pdf)
	Team B Sara Goenner, UOregon John Quale, UVirginia Beth Dobson, FAMU Simon Hare, Archventures, Inc. Michael Kelly, Temple Jeff Krska, Cal State Poly (Pomona) Jack Sample, Onset Computer
Hypothesis: The level of thermal comfort in the work spaces on levels one through three are outside the thermal comfort zone. Document: (1.5 mb pdf)
	Team C Jon Meendering, UOregon Judy Theodorson, WSU-Spokane Todd Gabbard, Kansas State Tom Martineau, FAMU Jack Parchesky, Onset Computer Devon Sylvester, Temple
Hypothesis: Noise generated in the Commons area disturbs workers in adjacent offices. Document: (1.3 mb pdf)
	Team D David Posada, UOregon Cris Benton, UC Berkeley Andy Beckham, FAMU Stuart Echols, Penn State Alaina Jones, North Carolina A&T Joanna Phillips, Onset Computer Kevin Settlemyre, BAC
Hypotheses: #1a - The light levels in the office spaces in which people are working are 20% below the light levels in common IES standards. #1b - The people working in these spaces are satisfied with these light levels. Document: (5.4 mb pdf)
	Team E Heidi Spaly, UOregon Bruce Haglund, UIdaho Ana Maria Corzo, North Carolina A&T Brooke Harrington, Temple Nathan Patrick, Penn State Hofu Wu, Cal State Poly (Pomona)
Hypothesis: Regardless of orientation, the natural illumination of the offices on the third floor is within 10% of each other. Document: (1.2 mb pdf)
	Team F Emily Wright, UOregon Jim Wasley, UWisconsin Milwaukee Don Corner, UOregon Adam Pelkey, FAMU Bob Powell, North Carolina A&T Jessica Ruben, Temple
Hypothesis: Valence convectors do not convect.  In the heating mode the valence convectors distribute heat primarily by radiation. Document: (0.4 mb pdf)
	Team G Wendy Fujinaka, RPI Nick Rajkovich, Cornell Mark Rylander, William McDonough + Partners Greg Thomson, BAC Rachel Weber, UOregon
Hypothesis: The skylights in the conference room on the third floor of the Woods Hole Research Center provide less than a 2% daylight factor under overcast sky conditions. Document: (1.9 mb pdf)